Risk Reduction when Conducting Working Conditions Special Assessment


Annotation:

The article presents the results of study related to risk reduction, improvement of the efficiency and quality of conducting working conditions special assessment by increasing the organizational transparency. A set of recommendations, which is developed based on the study results, is presented. It allows to obtain a positive effect for all the concerned parties. Positive social and economic effect is observed even when some of the recommendations are applied as part of one of the stages of the working conditions special assessment. However, the use of the recommendations for only one stage of the procedure for working conditions special assessment does not allow achieving the maximum positive social and economic effect, as well as a significant reduction in risks. The developed set of recommendations is partially based on the analysis of the experience of conducting working conditions special assessment at OOO «Gazprom dobycha Yamburg», and the economic appropriateness of introducing the entire complex or its individual elements should consider the specific features of each particular enterprise. The need in continuous monitoring of the process of conducting working conditions special assessment at the enterprise with the aim of developing and implementing measures aimed at improving its quality and organizational transparency is noted in the article. As a result, this will influence positively on the culture of safety at the enterprise.

References:
  1. López J.D., Isusi I., Llave O.V., Fric K., Rodriguez Contreras R., Peycheva D., Capecchi S., van Houten G., Curtarelli M. Improving working conditions in occupations with multiple disadvantages. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. 2015. October. pp. 5–124.
  2. Dobrolyubova E. International Experience in Evaluating Effectiveness of Public Control in Occupational Safety. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2016. № 2. pp. 96–110. (In Russ.).
  3. Health and Safety Executive. Annual Report and Accounts 2014/15. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/reports/ara-2014-15.htm (accessed: October 24, 2019).
  4. Large and small firms named Safe Work Awards finalists. Available at: https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/news/safework-media-releases/large-and-small-firms-named-safe-work-awards-finalists (accessed: October 24, 2019).
  5. Davoodi S., Haghighi K.S., Kalhori S.R.N., Hosseini N.S., Mohammadzadeh Z., Safdari R. Occupational Disease Registries-Characteristics and Experiences. Acta Informatica Medica. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5544442/ (accessed: October 24, 2019).
  6. Occupational safety. Unified Occupational Safety Management System at PAO Gazprom. Available at: http://www.gazprom.ru/about/production/safety/ (accessed: October 24, 2019). (In Russ.).
  7. Ivenkov S.G., Terebnev A.V., Emelyanov O.N., Pimenova I.N. Safety culture indexes as assessment criteria of occupational safety at oil and gas companies in Russia and abroad. Gazovaya promyshlennost = Gas Industry Magazine. 2017. № 2. pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).
  8. Amaya N., Rovira M.D., Cerro S., Grillo M., Nomenc R., Semperec J. Distributed Safety Management as a tool for creating a safety culture in university students and future professionals. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2019. № 1. pp. 114–119.
  9. Belyakov S.A., Zabudskiy A.I., Bayanova E.Yu. Analysis of foreign experience in economic stimulation of safe working conditions. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Omsk State Agrarian University. 2015. № 2. pp. 108–112. (In Russ.).
  10. Filimonov V.A., Gorina L.N. Process Model of Occupational Health and Safety Management System in the Organization. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 4. pp. 31–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-4-31-35
  11. Filimonov V.A., Gorina L.N. Specific features of the development of the OSH management system based on the process approach. Zapiski gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2019. Vol. 235. pp. 113–122. (In Russ.).
  12. On a special assessment of working conditions: Federal Law of December 28, 2013 № 426-FZ. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70452676/ (accessed: October 24, 2019). (In Russ.).
  13. Barkhordari A., Malmir B., Malakoutikhah M. An Analysis of Individual and Social Factors Affecting Occupational Accidents. Safety and Health at Work. 2019. № 1. pp. 1–8.
  14. Shchipanov A.V., Smaliy V.I. Organizational Transparency at Conducting Studies of the Work Environment and Labor Process. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 5. pp. 65–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-5-65-69
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-2-67-73
Year: 2020
Issue num: February
Keywords : working conditions special assessment of working conditions organizational transparency presence at the workplace measurement support rights and obligations of the participants employee rights violation of the assessment deadlines incorrect results
Authors:
  • Shchipanov A.V.
    Shchipanov A.V.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, avsh07@yandex.ru Togliatti State University, Togliatti, Russia
  • Smaliy V.I.
    Smaliy V.I.
    Lead Engineer, Regulatory Research Laboratory OOO «Gazprom dobycha Yamburg» PAO «Gazprom», Novy Urengoy, Russia