Safety Barriers: Notion, Classification, Concepts


Annotation:

The analysis of literature in the field of industrial safety devoted to safety barriers is provided. The history of occurrence of safety barriers concepts being rooted in the lectures on hazards analysis (HAZAN) of the Queensland University (Australia) where in 1979 the «bow-tie» diagram appeared for the first time is shown in the Article. In 1990s the Royal Dutch Shell Group adapted the «bow-tie» method as the standard of the company in the field of risk analysis and management. As a result the concept of safety barriers was widely adopted. In its essence the safety barriers represent the organizational and technical means of protection used for prevention, control or mitigation of accidents and other unwanted events. The concept of safety barriers found reflection in a number of semiquantitative methods of risk analysis. Their feature — a possibility of impact assessment of the organizational, technical and other methods and protection means (safety barriers) existing at the object on the processes of emergence, development and escalation of accidents at hazardous production facilities, and on their consequences as well. Also an important issue for correct understanding and application of the concept is classification of safety barriers. It is possible to classify safety barriers depending on their layout in the system, the functions executed by them or efficiency. The main most widespread methods of safety barriers classification are given. On the example of safety barriers applied for trunk oil pipelines the differences are shown in the existing approaches to their classification. Brief comparative analysis of Russian and foreign methods using the term «safety barrier» is provided.

I.S. Zhukov, Researcher, ilzhukov@safety.ru Autonomous Noncommercial Organization «Industrial Risk Research Agency», Moscow, Russia

References:

1. CGE Risk Management Solutions. Available at: www.cgerisk.com/knowledge-base/risk-assessment/the-bowtie-methodology (accessed: September 21, 2016).
2. The Full-Scale Experiment of Public Injury in Piper Alpha Disaster. London: HMSO, 1990.
3. Hollnagel E. Accident Analysis and Barrier Functions. Halden: Institute for Energy Technology, 1999.
4. Trbojevic V.M. Optimising Hazard Management by Workforce Engagement and Supervision. Liverpool: Health and safety executive, 2008.
5. Paaske B., Lisanov M.V., Safonov V.S., Petrulevich A.A. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2011. № 4. pp. 11–15.
6. Sklet S. Safety Barriers on Oil and Gas Platforms. Means Prevent Hydrocarbon Releases. Doctoral Thesis for the Degree of Doctor ingeniØr. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2005.
7. Duijm N.J., Market F. Safety-Barrier Diagrams for Documenting Safety on Hydrogen Applications. Available at: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/safety_biblio/ichs2007/4.1.143.pdf (accessed: September 21, 2016).
8. Delvosalle C., Fievez C., Pipart A. Accidental Risk Assessment Methdology for Industries in the Context of the Seveso II Directive. Deliverable D.1C. WP1. Mons: Major Risk Research Centre, 2004.
9. Svenson O. Risk Analysis. 1991. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. pp. 499–507.
10. Kecklund L.J., Edland A., Wedin P., Svenson O. Industrial Ergonomics. 1996. Vol. 17. Iss. 3. pp. 275–284.
11. Knox N.W., Eicher R.W. MORT User’s Manual. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1992.
12. Trost W.A., Nertney R.J. Barrier Analysis. Idaho Falls: Technical Research and Analysis Center, 1995.
13. Obshhie trebovanija k obosnovaniju bezopasnosti opasnogo proizvodstvennogo obekta: feder. normy i pravila v obl. prom. bezopasnosti: prikaz Rostehnadzora ot 15 ijulja 2013 g. № 306 (General Requirements to Substantiation of Safety of Hazardous Production Facility: Federal Norms and Rules in the Field of Industrial Safety: Order of Rostechnadzor of July 15, 2013 № 306). Ser. 03. Iss. 73. Moscow: ZAO NTC PB, 2013. 11 p.
14. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po razrabotke obosnovanija bezopasnosti opasnyh proizvodstvennyh obektov neftegazovogo kompleksa: ruk. po bezopasnosti: prikaz Rostehnadzora ot 30 sent. 2015 g. № 387 (Methodical Recommendations on the Development of Substantiation of Safety of Hazardous Production Facilities of Oil and Gas Complex: Safety Guide: Order of Rostechnadzor of September 30, 2015 № 387). Ser. 27. Iss. 14. Moscow: ZAO NTC PB, 2015. 47 p.
15. Metodicheskie osnovy po provedeniju analiza opasnostej i ocenki riska avarij na opasnyh proizvodstvennyh obektah: ruk. po bezopasnosti: prikaz Rostehnadzora ot 11 apr. 2016 g. № 144 (Methodical Bases on Conducting Hazards Analysis and Accidents Risk Assessment at Hazardous Production Facilities: Safety Guide: Order of Rostechnadzor of April 11, 2016 № 144). Ser. 27. Iss. 16. Moscow: ZAO NTC PB, 2016. 53 p.
16. GOST R MJeK 61511-1—2011. Bezopasnost funkcionalnaja. Sistemy bezopasnosti pribornye dlja promyshlennyh processov. Chast 1. Terminy, opredelenija i tehnicheskie trebovanija (GOST R IEC 61511-1—2011. Functional Safety. Instrumental Safety Systems for Industrial Processes. Part 1. Terms, Definitions and Technical Requirements). Moscow: Standartinform, 2013.
17. GOST R 54145—2010. Menedzhment riskov. Rukovodstvo po primeneniju organizacionnyh mer bezopasnosti i ocenki riskov. Obshhaja metodologija (GOST R 54145—2010. Risk Management. Guide on Application of Organizational Safety Measures and Risk Assessment. General Methodology). Moscow: Standartinform, 2012.
18. GOST R ISO/MJeK 31010—2011. Menedzhment riska. Metody ocenki riska (GOST R ISO /IEC 31010—2011. Risk Management. Methods of Risk Assessment). Moscow: Standartinform, 2012.
19. GOST R 54141—2010. Menedzhment riskov. Rukovodstvo po primeneniju organizacionnyh mer bezopasnosti i ocenki riskov. Jetalonnye scenarii incidentov (GOST R 54141—2010. Risk Management. Guide on Application of Organizational Safety Measures and Risk Assessment. Reference Scenarios of Incidents). Moscow: Standartinform, 2012.
20. STO Gazprom 2-2.3-569—2011. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po raschetu i analizu riskov pri jekspluatacii obektov proizvodstva, hranenija i morskoj transportirovki szhizhennogo i szhatogo prirodnogo gaza (STO Gazprom 2-2.3-569—2011. Methodical Guidelines on the Calculation and Risk Analysis at Operation of the Objects of Production, Storage and Sea Transportation of the Liquefied and Compressed Natural Gas). Moscow: OOO «Gazpromjekspo», 2011.
21. Regulations Relating to Design and Outfitting of Facilities, etc. In the Petroleum Activities (the Facilities Regulations). Stavanger: Petroleum Safety Authority Norway, 2015. Available at: http://www.ptil.no/facilities/category400.html# (accessed: March 30, 2017).

DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2017-5-49-56
Year: 2017
Issue num: May
Keywords : classification risk analysis safety barriers barrier function barrier system functional safety system safety methods and means of protection
Authors:
  • Zhukov I.S.
    Zhukov I.S.
    Research Associate, ilzhukov@safety.ru Autonomous Noncommercial Organization «Industrial Risk Research Agency», Moscow, Russia