The work is devoted to the identification and description of key psychosocial risk factors and characteristics of the environmental resource of shift workers at a logging enterprise in the Arkhangelsk region. The research was carried out by means of a scientific expedition in 2021 at the logging sites of the Arkhangelsk region. 106 employees took part in it (average age 38.3 ± 0.88 years, average shift work experience 6.5 ± 0.76 years, shift period of 14 days). Research methods: hardware psychophysiological methodology of assessing the state on the device Psychophysiologist (the level of functional state and functional reserves); psychological testing methodology (M. Lusher color test); questionnaire using the author questionnaire and the general questionnaire of psychosocial factors at work QPS Nordic. Statistical analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis with the help of SPSS 23.00 software package.
As a result of the research, it was revealed that during the shift period there is a positive dynamic of the logger functional states; the beginning and middle (shift change days) of the shift period are characterized by an acceptable state and require additional measures to restore it.
Statistically significant correlations are established between the level of functional capabilities, stress, and performance with the key blocks of psychosocial factors: social support from colleagues, management, relatives, and friends; working motives for developing oneself and applying creativity in work, the complexity and interest of the work performed. These factors contribute to maintaining the required level of functional states and increase the psychological safety of the work of the logging enterprise personnel.
2. Timber industry complex of the Arkhangelsk region: the results of work during pandemic. Available at: https://lpk-sibiri.ru/forest-industry/lpk-arhangelskoj-oblasti-itogi-raboty-v-pandemiyu/ (accessed: March 17, 2022). (In Russ.).
3. Safety and Health in Forestry Work: An ILO Code of Practice. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_107793.pdf (accessed: March 17, 2022).
4. Melemez K. Risk factor analysis of fatal forest harvesting accidents: A case study in Turkey. Safety Science. 2015. Vol. 79. pp. 369–378. DOI: 10.1016/J.SSCI.2015.07.004
5. Tsioras P.A., Rottensteiner C., Stampfer K. Wood harvesting accidents in the Austrian State Forest Enterprise 2000–2009. Safety Science. 2014. Vol. 62. pp. 400–408. DOI: 10.1016/J.SSCI.2013.09.016
6. Laschi A., Marchi E., Foderi C., Neri F. Identifying causes, dynamics and consequences of work accidents in forest operations in an alpine context. Safety Science. 2016. Vol. 89. pp. 28–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.017
7. Jankovský M., Allman M., Allmanová Z. What are the Occupational Risks in Forestry? Results of a Long-Term Study in Slovakia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019. Vol. 16 (24). pp. 4931. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16244931
8. Share of the organizations employees employed in harmful and (or) dangerous working conditions, by certain types of economic activity (as of the end of 2020). Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/HzfZTQFY/vred.png (accessed: March 17, 2022). (In Russ.).
9. Yoshimura T., Acar H.H. Occupational safety and health conditions of forestry workers in Turkey. Journal of Forest Research. 2004. Vol. 9. Iss. 3. pp. 225–232. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-004-0078-y
10. Lilley R., Feyer A.M., Kirk P., Gander P. A survey of forest workers in New Zealand. Do hours of work, rest, and recovery play a role in accidents and injury? Journal of Safety Research. 2002. Vol. 33. Iss. 1. pp. 53–71. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00003-8
11. Bowen J., Hinze A., Griffiths C. Investigating real-time monitoring of fatigue indicators of New Zealand forestry workers. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2019. Vol. 126. pp. 122–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.010
12. Mylek M.R., Schirmer J. Beyond physical health and safety: supporting the wellbeing of workers employed in the forest industry. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 2015. Vol. 88. Iss. 4. pp. 391–406. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpv011
13. Lagerstrom E., Magzamen S., Rosecrance J. A mixed-methods analysis of logging injuries in Montana and Idaho. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2017. Vol. 60. Iss. 12. pp. 1077–1087. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22759
14. Korneeva Ya.A. Functional States as a Psychological Safety Component of the Offshore Oil Production Platform Employees at the Rotational Labor Organization in the Caspian Sea. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. № 7. pp. 85–91. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-7-85-91
15. Sobchik L.N. Color selection method. Modification of the eight-color Luscher test: practical guide. Saint-Petersburg: Rech, 2012. 128 p. (In Russ.).
16. Aminev G.A., Aminev E.G., Safronov V.P. Tools of a penitentiary psychologist. Ufa: UYuI, 1997. 168 p. (In Russ.).
17. Korneeva Ya.A., Trofimova A.A., Korneeva A.V., Yureva A.S., Simonova N.N. Dynamics of the functional states of loggers during a fourteen-day shift check-in in the conditions of the Far North. Lichnost v ekstremalnykh usloviyakh i krizisnykh situatsiyakh zhiznedeyatelnosti: sb. nauch. st. X Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Personality in extreme conditions and crisis situations of the vital activity: collection of the scientific articles of the Tenth International Scientific and Practical Conference). Ulyanovsk, 2021. pp. 104–112. (In Russ.).
18. Korneeva Ya.A., Simonova N.N. Psychological analysis of environmental resource of workers in diamond mining, logging and oil and gas production facilities in the Far North. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2012. Vol. 14. № 2–6. pp. 1473–1479. (In Russ.).