Scientific and Methodological Base for Technical Diagnostics of Potentially Hazardous Production Facilities


Modern requirements to industrial safety presuppose the use of scientifically based methods and means of technical diagnostics for obtaining direct quantitative information sufficient for the subsequent normative calculation determination of a set of the parameters of strength, resource, reliability, survivability and risks. It is shown that such information includes data on the accumulated and developing technological and operational defects in the load-bearing elements, on the kinetics of stress-strain states in the most loaded hazardous zones of a structure, on the thermal, chemical, biological and radiation dangerous effects, on the changes in characteristics over time of the basic mechanical properties of material strength and ductility. Such an approach to diagnostics should be linked both with the existing system of a set of equations with the diagnosed parameters included in them for the analysis of permissible, hazardous and limiting states, and with the implementation of the results of new fundamental studies of complex deformation, damage and destruction processes that determine the probability of accidents and catastrophes at the production facilities, as well as relevant applied scientific and methodological, hardware and software developments. Relevance and importance of promising research and development in this direction are associated both with the facilities of I, II classes of hazard, and the objects that are critically and strategically important for national safety.

1. Technical Diagnostics and Accident Risk Assessment. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2016. № 5. pp. 83–85. (In Russ.).
2. Kuznetsov K.A. Technical Diagnostics in the Framework of Industrial Safety Expertise: Problems and Prospects. Bezopasnost Truda v Promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 11. pp. 24–31. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-11-24-31
3. Klyuev V.V. Degradation of safety diagnostics. Мoscow: Izdatelskiy dom «Spektr», 2012. 128 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kostogryzov A., Korolev V. Probability, Combinatorics and Control. London: IntechOpen, 2020. 322 p. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.79802
5. Bahr N.J. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2015. 420 p.
6. On the fundamentals of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of industrial safety for the period up to 2025 and further prospect: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 6, 2018 № 198. Available at: (accessed: October 29, 2019). (In Russ.).
7. Safety of Russia. Legal, socio-economic and scientific-technical aspects. Scientific basis of industrial safety. Moscow: MGOF «Znanie», 2019. 824 p. (In Russ.).
8. Makhutov N.A. Safety and risks: system research and developments. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2017. 724 p. (In Russ.).
9. Altenbach H., Eremeyev V.A., Igumnov L.A. Multiscale Solid Mechanics. Strength, Durability and Dynamics. Cham: Springer, 2021. 499 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-54928-2
10. Pluvinage G., Capelle J., Hadj Meliani M. A review of fracture toughness transferability with constraint and stress gradient. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures. 2014. Vol. 37. pp. 1165–1185.
11. Frolov K.V. Mechanics of catastrophes: the basics of calculating the residual life of equipment elements according to the criteria of fracture mechanics. Мoscow: FTsNTP PP «Bezopasnost», Assotsiatsiya KODAS, 2004. 70 p. (In Russ.).
12. Stepnov M.N. Probabilistic methods for assessing the characteristics of the mechanical properties of materials and the bearing capacity of structural elements. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005. 342 p. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-6-7-14
Year: 2021
Issue num: June
Keywords : safety reliability risk service life technical diagnostics life duration destruction damage life cycle hazardous production facilities equations of state
  • Makhutov N.A.
    Makhutov N.A.
    RAS Corresponding Member, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Chief Research Associate, IMASH RAN, Moscow, Russia
  • Gadenin M.M.
    Gadenin M.M.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Lead Researcher IMASH RAN, Moscow, Russia
  • Ivanov V.I.
    Ivanov V.I.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Chief Research Associate ZAO «NIIIN MNPO «Spektr», Moscow, Russia