Method of Professional Risk Assessment as the Element of Industrial Safety Concept


Annotation:

Occupational risk assessment models currently available in most cases are non-systematic and do not contain the clear approach to risk assessment. In accordance with the current Russian regulatory documents, the employer applies the results of special assessment of the working conditions for identification and assessment of risk levels and independently selects any existing methodology based on the specifics of its organization activities. Occupational management system begins with the identification of the occupational safety policy in the organization, the formation of the goals and objectives of the policy and the distribution of the responsibilities of line managers and ordinary employees. Each employee, to one degree or another, should take part in the formation of this system, in the development of occupational safety documentation in full cooperation of all the employer representatives. The most important part of the occupational safety management system at the enterprise should be: planning and approval of risk assessment procedure, identification of risks and determination of the required «barriers», selection of risk assessment methodology, and risk analysis, making decisions about the level of risks, and, in conclusion, defining measures on the reduction of the occupational risk level. The article shows the application of «Consequences and probabilities matrix» method (GOST R ISO/IEC 31010—2011). The proposed version of the occupational risk assessment method differs by the specifity of the description of risk ranking and assessment on the risk scale and the priority of measures on its reduction. The method is based on the assessment of consequence severity indicators and the likelihood of the occurrence of the event leading to health damage, which is performed in the specific organization by the working group on risk assessment. The method can be modified and applied to the assessment of the occupational risks at the performance of various production processes.

References:
  1. Mohandes S.R., Zhang X. Towards the development of a comprehensive hybrid fuzzy-based occupational risk assessment model for construction workers. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 115. pp. 294–309.
  2. Myasnikov S.V., Korshunov G.I., Kabanov E.I. The Method of the Comprehensive Assessment and the Forecast of the Occupational Risk of Injury to Coal Mine Personnel during Methane and Dust Explosions. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 5. pp. 60–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-5-60-65
  3. Berner C.L., Flage R. Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2017. Vol. 167. pp. 10–19.
  4. Papazoglou I.A., Aneziris O.N., Bellamy L.J., Ale B. Quantitative occupational risk model: Single hazard. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2017. Vol. 160. pp. 162–173.
  5. Lay A.M., Saunders R., Lifshen M., Breslin F.C., LaMontagne A.D., Tompa E., Smith P.M. The relationship between occupational health and safety vulnerability and workplace injury. Safety Science. 2017. Vol. 84. pp. 85–93.
  6. Stolbyuk O.V., Popova O.V., Taranushina I.I. Program «Zero Injury Rate» as a Factor of Ensuring Safe Working Conditions. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017. № 7. pp. 59–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2017-7-59-63
  7. Voroshilov A.S., Lee Khi Un, Fomin A.I. Risk Assessment of Industrial Injury Rate. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2016. № 6. pp. 73–77. (In Russ.).
  8. Tremblay A., Badri A. Assessment of occupational health and safety performance evaluation tools: State of the art and challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises. Safety Science. 2018. Vol. 101. pp. 260–267.
  9. Results of the year: occupational safety. Available at: https://rosmintrud.ru/labour/safety/263 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  10. Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34683/ (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  11. GOST R 54934—2012/OHSAS 18001:2007. Occupational health and safety management systems. Requirements. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200094433 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  12. GOST 12.0.230—2007. Occupational Safety Standards System. Occupational safety management systems. General requirements. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200052851 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  13. On the approval of the standard provision on the occupational safety management system: the order of Mintrud of Russia dated August 19, 2016 № 438n. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71413730/ (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  14. Lyubimov A. Risk assessment from scratch: how to build the system for undergoing inspection. Spravochnik spetsialista po okhrane truda = Occupational safety handbook of the specialist. 2018. № 11. Available at: https://e.otruda.ru/article.aspx?aid=682921 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  15. Code of the Russian Federation on administrative infractions. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661/ (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  16. GOST R 12.0.010—2009. Occupational Safety Standards System. Occupational safety management systems. Hazard identification and risk assessment. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200080860 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  17. GOST R ISO/IEC 31010—2011. Risk management. Risk assessment methods. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-iso-mek-31010-2011 (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
  18. On special assessment of working conditions: Federal law of December 28, 2013 № 426-FZ. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_156555/ (accessed: June 3, 2019). (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-7-74-80
Year: 2019
Issue num: July
Keywords : occupational risk industrial injuries industrial safety risk assessment methodology risk identification ranking risk assessment matrix
Authors:
  • Taranushina I.I.
    Taranushina I.I.
    ar1ni@yandex.ru, Candidate Rostov State Transport University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia Discipline Head OOO Southern Institute of Occupational and Industrial Safety of GK Aton, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
  • Popova O.V.
    Popova O.V.
    Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof. Rostov State Transport University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof. Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia