Classification of Occupational Safety Costs in terms of Medical Examinations in the Republic of Kazakhstan


The results of the study of the classification of occupational safety costs, in particular the classification of costs for medical examinations, according to the current requirements of the regulatory legal acts and documents of the Republic of Kazakhstan are presented.

The Labor Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan does not regulate the cost of financing occupational safety costs in the organizations. In addition, there are no state-approved methodology for planning and occupational safety budgeting costs.

International research in the field of occupational safety confirms the positive effect of the investments in occupational safety on the competitiveness, productivity, and sustainability of the enterprise at the market. At the same time, the methodologically sound organization of planning and financing of occupational safety costs depends on their correct classification, which further contributes to the construction of a rational budgetary system of the enterprise in the field of occupational safety. The need for cost classification is due to the fact, that the existing occupational safety activities have different signs and types of costs.

In the process of the study the empirical data is used, for example, codes, laws, and other regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as the scientific research from near and far abroad. The paper offers three signs of the classification of occupational safety costs. In accordance with the proposed signs of cost classification, the types of medical examinations that employers are legally required to conduct for their employees are distributed.

Thus, the classification of occupational safety costs, which is aimed at the cost management, should consider all the main options for solving managerial tasks of the enterprise in the field of occupational safety, and should be applicable in practice.

At the same time, the classification of costs with varying degrees of detail contributes to the sound planning and financing of the costs for employee occupational safety, which will lead to a positive result from the investment.

1. Tompa E., Dolinschi R., de Oliveira C. Practice and potential of economic evaluation of workplace-based interventions for occupational health and safety. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2006. Vol. 16. pp. 367–392.
2. Verbeek J.H., Pulliainen M., Kankaanpää E. A systematic review of occupational safety and health business cases. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2009. Vol. 35. pp. 403–412. DOI: 10.5271/SJWEH.1355
3. Uegaki K., de Bruijne M.C., van der Beek A.J., van Mechelen W., van Tulder M.W. Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a company's perspective: a systematic review of methods to estimate the cost of health-related productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2011. Vol. 21. pp. 90–99. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9258-0
4. Mayne T.J., Howard K., Brandt-Rauf P.W. Measuring and evaluating the effects of disease on workplace productivity. Journal of Occupation and Environmental Medicine. 2004. Vol. 46. Iss. 6. pp. S1–S2. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000126688.57275.6d
5. Anstadt G.W., Lester D.L., Powell B.H., Mitchell J.W., Tunaitis E.M. The business planning process applied to an in-house corporate occupational medicine unit. Journal of Occupational Medicine: Official Publication of the Industrial Medical Association. 1991. Vol. 33 (3). pp. 354–357.
6. Upchurch А.А. Management accounting: principles & practice. Мoscow: Finansy i statistika, 2002. 950 p. (In Russ.).
7. Golov S.F. Management Accounting: Textbook. Kiev: Tsentr uchebnoy literatury, 2018. 534 p. (In Ukr.).
8. Grishchenko O.V. Management accounting. Lecture notes. Taganrog: TTI YuFU, 2007. (In Russ.).
9. Nagata T., Mori K., Aratake Y., Ide H., Ishida H., Nobori J., Kojima R., Odagami K., Kato A., Tsutsumi A., Matsuda S. Development of cost estimation tools for total occupational safety and health activities and occupational health services: cost estimation from a corporate perspective. Journal of Occupational Health. 2014. Vol. 56 (3). pp. 215–224. DOI: 10.1539/joh.13-0277-FS
10. Ilyukhina N.A. Modernization of management expenditure system in food and processing industry. Tekhnologiya i tovarovedenie innovatsionnykh pishchevykh produktov = Technology and commodity science of the innovative food products. 2012. № 2. pp. 111–117. (In Russ.).
11. Ilyukhina N.A. Accounting system in the cost management of industrial enterprises. Мoscow, Berlin: Direkt-Media, 2015. 98 p. (In Russ.).
12. Ilyukhina N.A., Pronina A.S. Features of accounting for the costs of employee medical examination. Nauchnye zapiski OrelGIET = Scientific notes of OrelGIET. 2016. № 4 (16). pp. 6–11. (In Russ.).
13. Martynova N.N. Order of reflection of certain types of costs in the financial accounting. Obrazovanie i nauka bez granits: sotsialno-gumanitarnye nauki = Education and science without borders: social and humanitarian sciences. 2016. № 4. pp. 218–222. (In Russ.).
14. Popovich M.V., Manshina A.V., Kontsevaya A.V., Drapkina O.M. Corporate worker health promotion programs — review of foreign publications. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina = Preventive Medicine. 2020. Vol. 23. № 3. pp. 156–161. (In Russ.).
15. Kislova K.I. Expenses for medical examinations. Bukhgalterskiy uchet = Accounting. 2011. № 7. pp. 23–26. (In Russ.).
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2021-10-37-42
Year: 2021
Issue num: October
Keywords : cost planning occupational safety investments in occupational safety cost classification employee medical examinations
  • Aitkenova G.T.
    Aitkenova G.T.
    Master of Natural Sciences, Senior Research Assistant, Republican Scientific Research Institute for Labour Protection of Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of Population of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan