The article describes the concept of «zero injury», within the framework of which the current level of injury rate in the coal industry is analyzed, the causes of juries are given, and also, the problem of personnel qualification is raised. On the example of JSC «SUEK-Kuzbass», the analysis of industrial injury rate is presented. There are three key causes of injury: technical, systemic, and human factors. Qualitative dependence of the level of injury rate on time is given in the implementation of preventive measures — technical, systemic, and aimed at the formation of a safety culture, proposed by the International Labor Organization as a hypothesis confirmed at the number of enterprises in the mining industry, construction, and transport. Detailed analysis is conducted on such factors as profession, age and experience of the victims, the time elapsed after the start of the shift until the injury at work, as well as the competence of employees in safety matters. According to the analysis over the past three years, the most traumatic professions are: drifter, engineering and technical worker, underground miner, electrical fitter (locksmith), face miner, mining operator and driver. The most frequent injuries occurred with the employees with work experience of up to a year, from 5 to 10 years, and over 15 years. By age groups, the largest number of injuries was recorded for the employees aged from 31 to 35 years, which roughly corresponds to 5–10 years of work experience. Considering such a factor as the time from the beginning of a work shift to injury, it shall be noted that the greatest number of injuries occurs at the beginning of the shift and in the period 4–7 hours from the beginning of the shift. In accordance with GOST R ISO 45001—2020, the conducted analysis is an element of risk assessment and opportunities for further improvement of training programs for the employees in the field of occupational safety.
2. Fomin A.I., Khalyavina M.N., Osipova A.A. Occupational Injuries and Occupational Morbidity Problems Research. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra VostNII po promyshlennoy i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Scientific Centre VostNII for Industrial and Environmental Safety. 2017. № 4. pp. 82–90. (In Russ.).
3. Reports on the law enforcement practice of control and supervision activities in the Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service. Available at: http://www.gosnadzor.ru/public/law%20enforcement/index.php?Sphrase_id=1848296 (accessed: September 29, 2020). (In Russ.).
4. Gendler S.G., Grishina A.M. Unification of the Risk-Based Approach to Improving of Coal Mines Personnel Educational System in Rules and Regulations for Workers' Protection. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle = Bulletin of the Tula State University. Sciences of Earth. 2018. Iss. 4. pp. 42–50. (In Russ.).
5. Sedelnikov G.E. Competences and Staff Competence in the Field of Occupational Health and Safety. Competence Assessment. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti = Bulletin of Research Center for Safety in Coal Industry. 2014. № 2. pp. 138–143. (In Russ.).
6. Shirokov Yu.A. On Improving the Effectiveness of Training in the Field of Occupational Safety and Health. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020. № 11. pp. 89–94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-11-89-94
7. Sedelnikov G.E., Fomin A.I., Ermolaev A.M., Petrov E.A. Introduction of Digital Training Technologies to Improve the Quality of Employees Training in Occupational Safety. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019. № 1. pp. 62–66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-1-62-66
8. Zwetsloot G.I.J.M., Kines P., Wybo J.-L., Ruotsala R., Drupsteen L., Bezemer R.A. Zero Accident Vision based Strategies in Organisations: Innovative Perspectives. Safety Science. 2017. Vol. 91. pp. 260–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.016
9. Wang Y., Griffis F. The Theory of Zero Incident Safety Management. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering. 2018. Vol. 3. Iss. 3. pp. 83–98. DOI: 10.11648/j.jccee.20180303.15
10. Report - EU-OSHA review of successful Occupational Safety and Health benchmarking initiatives: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Available at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/report-eu-osha-review-successful-occupational-safety-and-health-benchmarking/view (accessed: November 30, 2020). (In Russ.).
11. Buldakova E.G., Gridina E.B. Analysis of Accident and Stages of Effective Safety Management System on the Example of «Vorkutaugol». Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2014. Vol. 207. pp. 95–98. (In Russ.).
12. Rudakov M.L. «Zero Accident» Corporate Programmes as an Element of Srategic Planning in the Field of Occupational Safety and Health at Coal Mining Enterprises. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2016. Vol. 219. pp. 465–471. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18454/PMI.2016.3.465
13. Kim Y., Park J., Park M. Creating a Culture of Prevention in Occupational Safety and Health Practice. Safety and Health at Work. 2016. Vol. 7. Iss. 2. pp. 89–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.002
14. Tskhadaya N.D., Zakharov D.Yu. Improvement of the Procedure of Recruitment of Personnel for Hazardous Work Environment. Zapiski Gornogo instituta = Journal of Mining Institute. 2018. Vol. 230. pp. 204–208. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25515/PMI.2018.2.204
15. Sorokopud Yu.V. Psychophysiological aspects of personnel development. Nauchnye issledovaniya i obrazovanie = Scientific research and education. 2015. № 1 (19). pp. 422–424. (In Russ.).
16. Sedelnikov G.E. Development of the computer video information complex for the continuous development of competence of the coal enterprises employees in the field of occupational safety: thesis... Candidate of Technical Sciences. Kemerovo, 2020. 146. (In Russ.).