Risk Analysis Based on Safety Culture Assessment Results


Annotation:

The model-based data of safety culture assessment are presented. The process of converting safety culture assessment results into the second-level risk factors using the AgenaRisk program is considered. The ratio of risk factors of the first and the second levels is shown considering the assignment of different weight to them. For inclusion of safety culture in the risk model, the risk factors of the first level are converted into the factors affecting safety culture, which makes it possible to switch from the qualitative knowledge to quantitative data. Such a conversion is called qualitative-quantitative transition, where the qualitative ranks are changed to probability distributions.

The results of the analysis of the incident with the formation of explosive cloud are presented. Based on the scenario of this incident, the Bayesian trust network model is built, including the fault tree and the event tree. Predictive and diagnostic substantiation of risk analysis using the AgenaRisk program is given. A priori general values of the probability of failure are corrected based on the new data, which are presented by the safety culture factors. As a result, the posteriori probability distributions were obtained for the incident scenario in the fault tree and the event tree.

Based on the proposed basic scenario, several analyses were performed. Within their framework the factors affecting the risk are identified that make the greatest contribution in achievement of the event certain probability. It is also found out how the deterioration in safety culture effects on the probability of consequences.

References:
  1. Garipov R.F., Sharafutdinova G.M., Zakirova Z.A. Safety culture assessment. Innovatsionnye tekhnologii — 2018: sb. st. po itogam Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Innovative Technologies — 2018: collected works based on the results of the International scientific-practical conference). Sterlitamak: AMI, 2018. pp. 13–18. (In Russ.).
  2. Minayeva I.A., Gazizov V.R. Formation of the Effective Culture of Safety as a Field of Improvement of the Occupational Safety System at Oil and Gas Industry Enterprises. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 8. pp. 48–52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-8-48-52
  3. Faynburg G.Z., Gavrikov A.A. Safety culture as an integral element of production culture. Bezopasnost i okhrana truda = Occupational safety. 2017. № 2. pp. 49–53. (In Russ.).
  4. RB-047—16. Safety Guide for the use of nuclear energy «Methodology for safety culture assessment at the nuclear fuel cycle enterprises». Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/456029058 (accessed: June 12, 2019). (In Russ.).
  5. Malashkina V.A., Pogorelaya Yu.V. Comparison of risk assessment and analysis methods at the mining enterprises. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten = Mining information and analytical bulletin. 2012. № 12. pp. 267–279. (In Russ.).
  6. Khasanova A.F., Gallyamov M.A. Identification of Safety Culture Level of Oil and Gas Company Employees by Questionnaire Method. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2018. № 11. pp. 54–56. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2018-11-54-56
  7. Fedosov A.V., Barakhnina V.B. Risk management, system analysis and modeling: textbook. Ufa: UGNTU, 2016. 47 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Dobroborskiy B.S. Machine safety and human factor: monography. Saint-Petersburg: SPbGASU, 2011. 111 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Nikolaev A.B. Prediction of the Human Factor Manifestation and Correction of its Negative Influence Probability. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti = Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017. № 9. pp. 52–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2017-9-52-57
  10. Tulupev A.L., Nikolenko S.I., Sirotkin A.V. Cycles in Bayesian networks: probabilistic semantics and relations with neighboring nodes. Trudy SPIIRAN = SPIIRAN Proceedings. 2006. Iss. 3. Vol. 1. pp. 240–263. (In Russ.).
  11. Heckerman D., Chickering D.M., Meek C., Rounthwaite R., Kadie C. Dependency Networks for Inference Collaborative Filtering, and Data Visualization. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2000. № 1. pp. 49–75.
  12. Cowell R.G., Dawid A.P., Lauritzen S.L., Spiegelhalter D.J. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC, 2007. 325 p.
  13. AgenaRisk: Bayesian Network Software for Risk Analysis and Decision Making. Available at: https://www.agenarisk.com/services (accessed: June 12, 2019).
  14. Fenton N.E., Neil M. Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018. 660 p. DOI: 10.1201/b21982
  15. Wang C., Mosleh A. Qualitative-Quantitative Bayesian Belief Networks for Reliability and Risk Assessment. Proc. of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. San Jose: IEEE, 2010.
DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-9-82-88
Year: 2019
Issue num: September
Keywords : safety culture assessment scenario risk analysis event tree fault tree Bayesian model
Authors:
  • Garipov R.F.
    Garipov R.F.
    Graduate Student, rusgar95@yandex.ru FSBEI HE Ufa State Petroleum Technical University, Ufa, Russia
  • Sharafutdinova G.M.
    Sharafutdinova G.M.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assoc. Prof. FSBEI HE Ufa State Petroleum Technical University, Ufa, Russia
  • Barakhnina V.B.
    Barakhnina V.B.
    Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assoc. Prof. FSBEI HE Ufa State Petroleum Technical University, Ufa, Russia